A)  Scoring Rubric for Quizzes and Homework (5 pts)

Level of Achievement

General Approach

Comprehension

Exemplary
(5 pts quizzes)

·  Addresses the question.

·  States a relevant, justifiable answer.

·  Presents arguments in a logical order.

·  Uses acceptable style and grammar (no errors).

·  Demonstrates an accurate and complete understanding of the question.

·  Backs conclusions with data and examples.

·  Uses 2 or more ideas, examples and/or arguments that support the answer.

Adequate
(3 pts quizzes)

·  Does not address the question explicitly, although does so tangentially.

·  States a relevant and justifiable answer.

·  Presents arguments in a logical order.

·  Uses acceptable style and grammar (one error)

·  Demonstrates accurate but only adequate understanding of question because does not back conclusions with examples and data.

·  Uses only one idea to support the answer.

·  Less thorough than above

Needs Improvement
(1 pts quizzes)

·  Does not address the question.

·  States no relevant answers.

·  Indicates misconceptions.

·  Is not clearly or logically organized.

·  Fails to use acceptable style and grammar (two or more errors).

·  Does not demonstrate accurate understanding of the question.

·  Does not provide evidence to support their answer to the question.

No Answer
(0 pts)

 

 

(Adapted from Diane Ebert-May, Michigan State Univ. http://www.flaguide.org/cat/rubrics/rubrics7.htm)


 

 

B) Scoring Rubric for Essay Questions (10 pts)

Level of Achievement

General Presentation

Reasoning, Argumentation

Exemplary
(10 pts)

·  Provides a clear and thorough introduction and background

·  Addresses the question

·  Presents arguments in a logical order

·  Uses acceptable style and grammar (no errors)

·  Demonstrates an accurate and complete understanding of the question

·  Uses several arguments and backs arguments with examples, data that support the conclusion

Quality
(8 pts)

·  Combination of above traits, but less consistently represented (1-2 errors)

·  Same as above but less thorough, still accurate

·  Uses only one argument and example that supports conclusion

Adequate
(6 pts)

·  Does not address the question explicitly, though does so tangentially

·  States a somewhat relevant argument

·  Presents some arguments in a logical order

·  Uses adequate style and grammar (more than 2 errors)

·  Demonstrates minimal understanding of question, still accurate

·  Uses a small subset of possible ideas for support of the argument.

Needs Improvement
(4 pts)

·  Does not address the question

·  States no relevant arguments

·  Is not clearly or logically organized

·  Fails to use acceptable style and grammar

·  Does not demonstrate understanding of the question, inaccurate

·  Does not provide evidence to support response to the question

No Answer
(0 pts)

 

 

 


 

 C) Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations (20 pts)

(Animal Presentations)

Level of Achievement

General Presentation

Comprehension

Exemplary
(20 pts)

·  Provides a clear and thorough introduction to topic

·  Addresses the points required

·  Presents information in a logical order

·  Uses clear speaking voice, formal language, and good eye contact with audience

·  Demonstrates an accurate and complete understanding of the topic

·  Uses several specific examples or details  to inform audience about topic

Quality
(17 pts)

·  Combination of above traits, but less consistently represented (1-2 errors)

·  Same as above but less thorough, still accurate

·  Demonstrates an accurate understanding of the topic

 · Uses only one example or detail to describe topic

Adequate
(15 pts)

·  Does not address the required points explicitly, though does so tangentially

·  Presents some information in a logical order

·  Uses adequate speaking style, but not always formal language or good eye contact

·  Demonstrates minimal understanding of topic, though still accurate

·  Uses a small subset of possible details to describe 

Needs Improvement
(12 pts)

·  Does not address the required points

·  Is not clearly or logically organized

·  Fails to use acceptable speaking style

·  Does not demonstrate understanding of the topic, inaccurate

·  Does not provide examples or details

No Answer
(0 pts)

 

 

 

- Return to SW Ecology Home Page -