Intermediate
Macroeconomics
Topic
Two: The Classical Model
“Main”
Cast of Characters:
Adam Smith, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth
of Nations (1776)
David Ricardo, Principles of Political Economy (1817)
John Stuart Mill, Principles of Political Economy (1848)
Jean-Baptiste Say, Treatise of Political Economy (1803)
Broad
message:
Equilibrium:
Long-run
economists:
Government
policies:
Full
Employment:
This
version of the classical model seeks to explain the determinants of an
economy’s level of:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Assumptions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
All
of these assumptions (1-5) will assure that markets will always clear.
Two
Sectors:
Money is neutral:
Three
Components of the Model:
1.
2.
3.
Micro
foundations:
Short-run
production function:
Inputs:
Aggregate
(GDP = Y):
So
we can write the short run aggregate production function as:
Y = AF(K,L)
Where:
Y
= real output per period
K
= the quantity of capital inputs used per period
L
= the quantity of labor inputs used per period (or employment)
A
= an index of total factor productivity (or an autonomous growth
factor which captures the impact of improvements in technology and any other
influences which raise the overall effectiveness of an economy’s use of its
factors of production, and
F
= a function which relates real output to the inputs of K and L
Graphically:
Three
Important Points:
1.
For any given values of A and K, there is a positive relationship
between employment (L) and output (Y), shown as a movement along the
production function from a to b (example).
2.
The production function exhibits diminishing marginal returns to the
variable input – the slope declines as employment increases.
Marginal product of labor (MPL) = DY/DL
declines as employment expands. This
is shown by a downward sloping MPL curve.
3.
The production function will shift upwards if the capital input is
increased and/or there is an increase in the productivity of the inputs
represented by an increase in the value of A (i.e, and increase in technology).
So
now we know how the aggregate level of output is determined in the model –
depends upon how much labor and capital are employed.
So the next obvious question is:
How
is aggregate employment determined? Or
in the other words, how do we find the demand and supply of labor?
Profit
maximizing firm:
MR
= MC
The Demand for Labor is determined in a similar way:
If
a firm hires labor, it must pay a money wage = W.
The additional cost of hiring an extra unit of labor = W times the change in labor units.
MPL - Marginal Productivity of Labor = The
additional revenue generated by hiring an additional worker = P times Q
(where Q is the extra output produced).
Example:
If the wage rate = $10 hr. and the MPL = $20 (for this particular worker), should we hire him/her?
Yes. The worker is contributing more to the firm than he/she is costing the firm.
Remember
that the MPL declines as the amount of labor is employed (diminishing marginal
returns), the MPL curve is downward sloping.
Since the profits will be maximized when a firm equates the MPL with W/P,
the marginal product curve is equivalent to the firm’s demand curve for
labor (DL). In other words, the
firm will always hire the number of workers where MPL = real wage (W/P).
Graphically:
The
demand for labor then is a function of the real wage
(inverse relationship). If the real wage increases, the demand for labor decreases
(in order to increase the MPL to meet the higher real wage).
DL
= DL(W/P)
The
Supply of Labor
Labor/leisure
tradeoff:
Substitution
effect:
Income
effect:
Competitive
Equilibrium Output and Employment
Graphically:
Full
Employment:
Unemployment
(voluntary or frictional -- choosing not to work at the market wage)
=.
Aggregate Supply or Productivity or Output
Now,
once the level of employment is determined in the labor market, the level of
output is determined by the position of the aggregate production function.
So
what will change these values?
1.
2.
Graphical
example: An increase in technology
that increases the MPL.
The
Exception – Government Intervention
Graphically:
What
about demand? Would all of the
productivity be consumed?
Say’s
Law:
Strong
Version
- equilibrium version with full employment:
This
is backed up by the:
Classical
theory of interest rate determination, savings and investment:
E
(aggregate expenditures) = C + I = Y
Both
C and I are a function of the interest rate (r).
Y
= C + S
S
= function (r) (+) (reward for thrift) – supply of loanable funds
So
therefore, C = function (r) (-)
I
= function (r) (-) – demand for
loanable funds
Graphically:
So
if C falls, no problem because I will go up
– if C increases, I will go down. Expenditures
are maintained at the same level.
What
determines the price level in the Classical model?
The
Quantity Theory of Money
Fisher
(income version) Approach:
The
equation of exchange:
MV = PY
V
= velocity of money (the average number of times a unit of money is used).
Note
that V is the reciprocal of the demand for money.
If V is high, the proportion of $ national income held (money demand) is low and vice
versa.
V
changes very slowly (institutional factors).
So with V and Y constant – an increase in M will just cause P to increase.
The
bottom line is that money is simply a veil – it does not create real wealth
(productivity) in the economy.
Aggregate
Demand/Aggregate Supply and Changes in M (how the price level is determined)
AS
is vertical or perfectly inelastic:
Graphically:
Assume
there is an increase in the money supply
in an attempt to increase output and employment.
Money is neutral. It does not contribute to real productivity in the economy.